Page 40 of 59	
  The GW AEM is designed to simulate the change in the groundwater system due to coal resource development directly, not to simulate historical conditions in the Galilee sedimentary basin. Comparison with historical observations of groundwater pressure or fluxes is therefore not possible or warranted. Fitting a complex model to a limited observation dataset that is not designed to inform such exercise, but designed to monitor water resources, will lead to biased parameter estimates which subsequently will lead to biased model predictions (Doherty and Welter, 2010). In this light, the unconstrained suite of parameters employed here are conservative and less prone to bias.
	  	
	  	  				  	
	    
	    					Last updated: 				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  
		            
	    6 December 2018	  
	
	  	
	  	
						
			  		
	    					Summary and download				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  
	
	  	
	  	Product Finalisation date
	    					2018						
			  		
    
  
	    					PRODUCT CONTENTS				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  - 2.6.2.1 Methods
 - 2.6.2.2 Review of existing models
- 2.6.2.2.1 Alpha and Kevin's Corner model review
 - 2.6.2.2.2 Carmichael model review
 - 2.6.2.2.3 China First model review
 - 2.6.2.2.4 China Stone model review
 - 2.6.2.2.5 South Galilee model review
 - 2.6.2.2.6 Galilee Basin hydrogeological model review
 - 2.6.2.2.7 Suitability of existing groundwater models
 - References
 - Datasets
 
 - 2.6.2.3 Model development
 - 2.6.2.4 Boundary and initial conditions
 - 2.6.2.5 Implementation of the coal resource development pathway
 - 2.6.2.6 Parameterisation
 - 2.6.2.7 Observations and predictions
 - 2.6.2.8 Uncertainty analysis
 - 2.6.2.9 Limitations and conclusions
 - Citation
 - Acknowledgements
 - Currency of scientific results
 - Contributors to the Technical Programme
 - About this technical product
 
ASSESSMENT
	    					ASSESSMENT COMPONENT