Page 1 of 41
Summary
A generic methodology for surface water modelling in the Bioregional Assessment Programme is reported in companion submethodology M06 (as listed in Table 1) (Viney, 2016). Section 2.6.1.1 describes the departures from that generic methodology that have been applied in the Clarence‑Moreton bioregion. The main difference is that in the Clarence‑Moreton bioregion, no river modelling is done because the effects of regulation are small. Instead, streamflow is predicted by accumulating output from the Australian Water Resources Assessment landscape model (AWRA‑L).
Last updated:
18 October 2018
Summary and download
Product Finalisation date
2016
PRODUCT CONTENTS
- 2.6.1.1 Methods
- 2.6.1.2 Review of existing models
- 2.6.1.3 Model development
- 2.6.1.4 Calibration
- 2.6.1.5 Uncertainty
- 2.6.1.6 Prediction
- 2.6.1.6.1 Annual flow (AF)
- 2.6.1.6.2 Interquartile range (IQR)
- 2.6.1.6.3 Daily streamflow at the 99th percentile (P99)
- 2.6.1.6.4 Flood (high-flow) days (FD)
- 2.6.1.6.5 Daily streamflow at the 1st percentile (P01)
- 2.6.1.6.6 Low-flow days (LFD)
- 2.6.1.6.7 Low-flow spells (LFS)
- 2.6.1.6.8 Longest low-flow spell (LLFS)
- 2.6.1.6.9 Zero-flow days (ZFD)
- 2.6.1.6.10 Summary and conclusions
- References
- Datasets
- Citation
- Contributors to the Technical Programme
- Acknowledgements
- About this technical product
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT COMPONENT