Breadcrumb
- Home
- Assessments
- Bioregional Assessment Program
- Namoi subregion
- 3-4 Impact and risk analysis for the Namoi subregion
- 3.5 Impacts on and risks to water-dependent assets
- 3.5.5 Potential impacts on an individual asset
		Page 37 of 55	
  It is not possible to report potential impacts on each of the hundreds of individual assets within the zone of potential hydrological change. However, the information and data from the previous sections are available for future work trying to assess potential impacts on individual assets. Case studies to illustrate how multiple lines of available hydrological and ecological evidence may be useful in assessing potential impacts on individual assets are detailed in the impact and risk analyses of the Hunter and Galilee subregions (Herron et al., 2018, Lewis et al., 2018).
	  	
	  	  				  	
	    
	    					Last updated: 				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  
		            
	    6 December 2018	  
	
	  	
	  	 
						
			  		
	    					Summary and download				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  
	
	  	
	  	Product Finalisation date
	    					2018						
			  		
    
  
	    					PRODUCT CONTENTS				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  - 3.1 Overview
- 3.2 Methods
- 3.3 Potential hydrological changes
- 3.4 Impacts on and risks to landscape classes- 3.4.1 Overview
- 3.4.2 Landscape classes that are unlikely to be impacted
- 3.4.3 'Floodplain or lowland riverine' (non-Pilliga) landscape group
- 3.4.4 'Non-floodplain or upland riverine' (non-Pilliga) landscape group
- 3.4.5 Pilliga riverine (upland and lowland)
- 3.4.6 Potentially impacted landscape classes lacking quantitative ecological modelling
- References
- Datasets
 
- 3.5 Impacts on and risks to water-dependent assets
- 3.6 Commentary for coal resource developments that are not modelled
- 3.7 Conclusion
- Citation
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors to the Technical Programme
- About this technical product
ASSESSMENT
	    					ASSESSMENT COMPONENT				    
	    
	  	  	
	  	
	  
	
	  	
	  	