Breadcrumb
Page 33 of 41
Summary
Limitations of the bioregional assessment (BA) for the Namoi subregion receptor impact models and the knowledge gaps that prevented qualitative models for some potentially impacted landscape classes being developed into quantitative models are summarised. Some of the main hurdles encountered in the formulation of qualitative and quantitative models include the availability of resources and expertise to model all potentially impacted landscape classes and the spatial limitations on where hydrological impacts can be evaluated.
Last updated:
6 December 2018
Summary and download
Product Finalisation date
2018
PRODUCT CONTENTS
- 2.7.1 Methods
- 2.7.2 Prioritising landscape classes for receptor impact modelling
- 2.7.3 'Floodplain or lowland riverine' landscape group
- 2.7.4 'Non-floodplain or upland riverine' landscape group
- 2.7.5 Pilliga riverine landscape classes
- 2.7.6 'Rainforest' landscape group
- 2.7.7 'Springs' landscape group
- 2.7.8 Limitations and gaps
- Citation
- Acknowledgements
- Contributors to the Technical Programme
- About this technical product
ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT COMPONENT